dodger_sister: (trio-gildedanddusted)
[personal profile] dodger_sister
HARRY POTTER, BITCHES! MIDNIGHT SHOWING!!!

Oh yeah. Forgive me typos, as it is mother fucking late and it was awesome!!!

No Spoilers here...but just let me say that my wizard boyfriend, George, is a bad-ass mother fucker and I love him. Shut up, people who are telling me he was only in the movie for ten minutes. I love him. As does his brother, Fred.

Sadly, my wizard bestest best friend, Charlie, has still never been seen, or even mentioned for that matter.

It was beautiful and wonderful and awesome. It was very well shot and photographed. There is a scene in the graveyard that was so beautiful that it had me crying and with little goosebumpy chills from both the beauty of the way the scene looked, and the emotion those kids were able to express. (Btw, hasn't Emma grown up to be beautiful?)

There were a few scenes that I distinctly remember from the books that were missing, but they were not plot pieces. They were just scenes I remember liking, but other than that, I have no complaints.

They did a great job showing the way the world had changed since Voldermort rose. The very, very first scene was terrifying and I wanted to huggle Snape and Draco, it was quite awful to watch.

I had forgotten one major thing that happened, somehow, and right before it did, I was like, "Oh no," because I remembered and then I cried. I had forgotten that all I did while reading the seventh book was cry.

It was great. The movie crowd was really good too, but there was no loud clapping when it ended. Probably because of the note it ended on.

I had fun.

I have more to say on Harry Potter in general, but I have to go to bed now.

In Sum: Dudes! They showed a trailer for Green Lantern! Ryan Reynolds, bitches! He must be so psyched, he is such a stupid GL fanboy and he has been lobbying for that part for years and he looks so mother fucking bad ass.

Yes, I do swear like a drunkard when I am excited and tired, thank you.

Goodnight.

Date: 2010-11-23 09:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dodger-sister.livejournal.com
I thought the second movie was the worst of all, but I didn't much care for the second book, so I wasn't all disappointed. Whereas the fourth book was my fav and then the movie was so god awful, that my heart was all broken.

The first movie was cute and fun, but it was for kids, as was the book. It was almost word for word the book too. I actually saw the first movie on a whim, cuz my cousins were all going and I was like, "sure I'll go whatever, popcorn", even though I had never read the books - and then I thought it was cute, so I read the book and was shocked at how almost exactly the same it was. Then I kept reading the books and then the movies kind of sucked, at least by comparison. The third was a great movie but seemed very different from the book.

This one blew me away! They were incredibly smart to split it into two movies, I agree.

NARNIA!!

Date: 2010-11-24 10:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wolfrider89.livejournal.com
Yeah, the second book was my least favorite one as well. The third is one of my favorites, though, so I was about as sad as you was over the forth one there. I mean, Sirius? Seriously? They managed to make him better for the fifth, though, but I'm still a bit pissed they messed that up for me.

My teacher was actually reading the first one to us in class, so I have all the names in my head with Swedish pronounciation. It's luckily wearing off, but it was weird when I started reading them in English. :P

Narnia! *bounce*

I think I need a HP icon.

Date: 2010-11-25 06:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dodger-sister.livejournal.com
The third book was great, cuz I am hardcore over Lupin, baby. And I thought the third movie was a great movie but it was a horrid book adaptation. If you had never read the books, it was easy to follow, well shot and edited - but having read the books, I didn't get so much of the characters that made the book, and the books that followed it, so good. Yes, they cut out so much of the human emotion. I know that is hard to convey from book to movie, but I felt like they lost a lot in movie three. But it was still easier to follow, much better put together than either 2 or 4, which felt like they had chunks missing. Unfortunately the chunks missing in three, were the character elements.

Date: 2010-11-25 06:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wolfrider89.livejournal.com
Yeah, I agree. It's a long time since I saw the third movie, but I don't recall the same feeling of "WTF?" as the forth one gave. It was so rushed, jumping in time in a way that made no sense even to those who had read the books.

Date: 2010-11-27 04:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dodger-sister.livejournal.com
THAT was what it was about the fourth movie that I hated - it didn't flow at all. It jumped around, and forward in time, and the scenes didn't fit together at all. It felt so badly edited. They killed my book!

Date: 2010-11-28 01:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wolfrider89.livejournal.com
They killed my book!
Couldn't agree more. :(

Profile

dodger_sister: (Default)
dodger_sister

May 2020

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
101112 13141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 24th, 2025 04:39 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios